Funny to hear Karlan bring up NBC clause today.... they’ve been fighting to remove/ignore it for decades.....

Quote: Right_in_Virginia wrote in post #77

---

Peter Baker
@peterbakernyt
·
4m
Norm Eisen, who is now questioning the witnesses for the Democrats, was White House ethics counsel for Obama and then his ambassador to the Czech Republic.

---

Until recently, I never believed that I had any masochistic inklings.... but voluntarily listening to these hearings has made me rethink that....

As expected, Karlan gets the whole "bribery" aspect completely backwards.....

The Founders were concerned about a POTUS taking a bribe.... not offering a bribe.....

So it is pretty clear that the Majority strategy is to have their professors weigh in on the made up "findings of fact" from the Majority HPSCI report...

Let's hope that the Minority will flip the script and question them about the Minority HPSCI report later....

Wow, this has to be the longest 45 minutes of pain I ever have willingly listened to....

Of note: only 1 question to Turley so far by the Majority.... that was to get him to Yes/No about a prior comment he made (without the full context, of course).....

Majority time runs out.... Chair calls for 10 minute break.... will resume with Minority 45 minutes of time ....

Quote

---

Jack Posobiec
🇺🇸
@JackPosobiec
·
32m
ABC refers to Feldman as a 'constitutional scholar' but gives no title at all to Turley

When you know what to look for, you can't stop seeing it
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EK9P2u7XsAEd...ng&name=360x360

---

Interestingly, OANN is not covering this hearing... at the moment, they are rerunning this episode: "Rants" and "Raves"

ETA: correction, they are running Part 2 of the series.... have to catch this later....

They are back.... Ranking Member Collins on the clock....


Addresses Turley.... says that you are now "well rested!!"

Giving Turley the opportunity to expand on his comment that was cut off before....

Turley jokes: "I can't believe that there is much more for me to discuss after my robust exchanges with Majority counsel...."


Turley taking the time now to correct the record about what "bribery" meant in the impeachment clause....


He is good, very good.... and the perfect person to do this, as he reminds us all that he "has no dog in this fight...."

Points out that in a recent SC ruling, the idea of a boundless interpretation of bribery was rejected unanimously....

I can't wait to get a hold of the transcript for Turley's testimony today.... it is fantastic....