SIGH!!! Just when my ability to stream begins to recover the lady with the microwave hair shows up!

Lofgren needs to be careful or she's going to be a fact witness for Durham's prosecutions.

Philbin: The constitution says the president cannot be impeached for exercising his executive powers. (Now again going over immunity, EP and the Schitt committee's null and void subpoenas)

The separation of powers was enshrined in the constitution not because it is the most efficient form of government but because the friction it causes insures freedom because no one branch rules over the other.

The president is not dependent on the legislature or subject to the legislature ... by design.

Quote: Tinker wrote in post #241

---

SIGH!!! Just when my ability to stream begins to recover the lady with the microwave hair shows up!

---

Jeffries is now explaining to us the legal codes violated by the President .... even though none were claimed in the articles of impeachment.

This shit, too, is taking on Dersh. LOL!

Jeffries, too, does the hand waving, finger pointing theatrics. He must have learned that under the section entitled: "How to insult your jury, over and over and over again"

Quote: Right_in_Virginia wrote in post #245

---

Jeffries is now explaining to us the legal codes violated by the President .... even though none were claimed in the articles of impeachment.

This shit, too, is taking on Dersh. LOL!

---

Dersh: The reason the framers chose a 2/3 vote to remove a President is to insure the removal is not a one party decision....you need members of both parties for removal.

You do not need both parties to impeach a president.

2 R question; 2 D questions and we're done!

Thought sifting through the Cliff's Notes on what's happening with this mess here would be more entertaining than watching this live. I was wrong. There is no way to make this fraud impeachment interesting at all. I am dumbfounded that the "Whistleblows" is still an off limits topic. Chief Paid-off Justice Roberts is a real peach, isn't he?

It pretty much sums up why no one is tuned into this sleepy impeachment. I've watched budget committee hearings on Cspan with more sizzle.

Quote: Hansel wrote in post #252

---

Thought sifting through the Cliff's Notes on what's happening with this mess here would be more entertaining than watching this live. I was wrong. There is no way to make this fraud impeachment interesting at all. I am dumbfounded that the "Whistleblows" is still an off limits topic. Chief Paid-off Justice Roberts is a real peach, isn't he?

It pretty much sums up why no one is tuned into this sleepy impeachment. I've watched budget committee hearings on Cspan with more sizzle.

---

Quote: Right_in_Virginia wrote in post #253

---

FWIT, Rand Paul is up in arms that the CJ won't allow him to ask a question calling the WB by name.

---

Can't argue with your points @Hansel