Sekulow then looked at House managers, “you said you proved your case” --Paused -- “Then we don’t need any more witnesses.” Walks away.

Schitts cleaning the back of his legs now.

Schitt's up asked to respond to Sekulow.

Someone please tell me what he said.

Oh, forgot to mention: Sekulow: “They are acting like this is some municipal traffic court proceeding.”

Schiff now wants the Chief Justice to rule on admissibility. THAT's never been done before in an impeachment.

Suck up.

I couldn't moot fast enough...just caught Jeffries say "the evidence is overwhelming".

Has the fool been asleep for the past 15 minutes??

Consensus on Al Gore's Interwebs is based on Schiff's last answer Sekulow mentioning Schiff as a fact witness rattled him .......

Sanders just asked a question .... no conflict of interest here.

Quote: EdJames wrote in post #190

---

Quote: Right_in_Virginia wrote in post #189

---

Sanders just asked a question .... no conflict of interest here.

---

What was it? I was outside cleaning the grille....

---

Quote: Right_in_Virginia wrote in post #191

---

Quote: EdJames wrote in post #190

---

Quote: Right_in_Virginia wrote in post #189

---

Sanders just asked a question .... no conflict of interest here.

---

What was it? I was outside cleaning the grille....

---

Sorry .. it was to Schiff. I'm on mute.

From what I've read the question was: Sanders: How can we believe the President when he's lied over 16,000 (?) times by my count?

---

Quote

---

Paul McLeod
@pdmcleod
·
1m
Bernie Sanders’ question takes a big swipe at Trump. He asks given Trump’s “thousands of lies… why should we be expected to believe anything president Trump says has credibility?”

Schiff gets up and says “Well, I’m not quite sure where to begin with that question.”

---

OMG ... Poor Philbin has to explain executive privilege and separation of powers AGAIN.

Question from Sen Warren .... another question with no conflict of interest.