I think they are counting the flu cases as Covid positive cases. Just more "liars figuring".

Quote: Alicewonders wrote in post #4

---

I think they are counting the flu cases as Covid positive cases. Just more "liars figuring".

---

Quote: Magwitch wrote in post #5

---

Quote: Alicewonders wrote in post #4

---

I think they are counting the flu cases as Covid positive cases. Just more "liars figuring".

---

The PCR test has its limitations, but mistaking SARS-CoV-2 DNA for influenza virus DNA is not among them.

More people are being more careful, and it's being more effective against flu than it is against Covid-19.

---

The PCR test detects specific DNA - whatever is programmed (PCR tests are used for many things, not just to diagnose some disease). The Covid PCR test detects SARS-CoV-2 DNA. One of the limitations of the Covid PCR test is that it cannot discern between DNA from a live virus or DNA from a fragment of a dead virus. In practical terms, a person who has recovered from Covid will still test positive for several weeks. Another limitation is that it cannot determine whether a person has a mild infection or a severe infection.

For diagnosing any disease, the PCR test is quick, specific, but with limitations; IMO, it is currently being used and interpreted beyond what it is realistically capable.

Quote: Sanguine wrote in post #7

---

OK, one of two things is accurate:

1. the seasonal flu is nonexistent this winter because the CCP flu efforts worked.
2. seasonal flu infection numbers are being rolled into CCP flu numbers

#1 cannot be true because if the efforts worked, there would be no CCP flu either and therefore, #2 is the only reasonable conclusion.

---

Quote: Magwitch wrote in post #8

---

The PCR test detects specific DNA - whatever is programmed (PCR tests are used for many things, not just to diagnose some disease). The Covid PCR test detects SARS-CoV-2 DNA. One of the limitations of the Covid PCR test is that it cannot discern between DNA from a live virus or DNA from a fragment of a dead virus. In practical terms, a person who has recovered from Covid will still test positive for several weeks. Another limitation is that it cannot determine whether a person has a mild infection or a severe infection.

For diagnosing any disease, the PCR test is quick, specific, but with limitations; IMO, it is currently being used and interpreted beyond what it is realistically capable.

---

Quote: Magwitch wrote in post #5

---

Quote: Alicewonders wrote in post #4

---

I think they are counting the flu cases as Covid positive cases. Just more "liars figuring".

---

The PCR test has its limitations, but mistaking SARS-CoV-2 DNA for influenza virus DNA is not among them.

More people are being more careful, and it's being more effective against flu than it is against Covid-19.

---

As promised, here is the proof of how flawed the PCR testis, from the literature of the testing companies:

excerpt:

From the FDA: “LabCorp COVID-19 RT-PCR test EUA Summary – December 9, 2020; EMERGENCY USE AUTHORIZATION (EUA) SUMMARY COVID-19 RT-PCR TEST (LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA)” [pg 2] [6]:

“…The SARS-CoV-2RNA [COVID virus] is generally detectable in respiratory specimens during the acute phase of infection. Positive results are indicative of the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA; clinical correlation with patient history and other diagnostic information is necessary to determine patient infection status…THE AGENT DETECTED MAY NOT BE THE DEFINITE CAUSE OF DISEASE (CAPS are mine). Laboratories within the United States and its territories are required to report all positive results to the appropriate public health authorities.”

Translation: On the one hand, we claim the test can “generally” detect the presence of the COVID virus in a patient. But we admit that “the agent detected” on the test, by which we mean COVID virus, “may not be the definite cause of disease.” We also admit that, unless the patient has an acute infection, we can’t find COVID. Therefore, the idea of “asymptomatic patients” confirmed by the test is nonsense. And even though a positive test for COVID may not indicate the actual cause of disease, all positive tests must be reported—and they will be counted as “COVID cases.” Regardless.

From a manufacturer of PCR test kit elements, Creative Diagnostics, “SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus Multiplex RT-qPCR Kit” [7] [7a]:

“Regulatory status: For research use only, not for use in diagnostic procedures.”

Translation: Don’t use the test result alone to diagnose infection or disease. Oops.

“Specificity: non-specific interference of Influenza A Virus (H1N1), Influenza B Virus (Yamagata), Respiratory Syncytial Virus (type B), Respiratory Adenovirus (type 3, type 7), Parainfluenza Virus (type 2), Mycoplasma Pneumoniae, Chlamydia Pneumoniae, etc.”

Translation: Although this company states the test can detect COVID, it also states the test can read FALSELY positive if the patient has one of a number of other irrelevant viruses in his body. What is the test proving, then? Who knows? Flip a coin.

“Application: Qualitative”

Translation: This clearly means the test is not suited to detect how much virus is in the patient’s body. That’s another indication that the test is useless for determining whether the patient is ill—since millions and millions of virus must be present, in order to produce illness.

“The detection result of this product is only for clinical reference, and it should not be used as the only evidence for clinical diagnosis and treatment. The clinical management of patients should be considered in combination with their symptoms/signs, history, other laboratory tests and treatment responses. The detection results should not be directly used as the evidence for clinical diagnosis, and are only for the reference of clinicians.”

Translation: Don’t use the test as the exclusive basis for diagnosing a person with COVID. And yet, this is exactly what health authorities are doing all over the world. All positive tests must be reported to government agencies, and they are counted as COVID cases.

Those quotes, from official government and testing sources, torpedo the whole “scientific” basis of the test.

CONCLUSION: The PCR test is useless and deceptive. It provides de facto dictators the opportunity to cite “new case levels” and lock down populations, creating economic and human devastation.

RESIST, REBEL, PROTEST, OPEN UP THE ECONOMY ANY WHICH WAY YOU CAN.

And get this information out there, far and wide.



https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021/02/...their-own-lies/

To me, any Covid numbers are to be taken with the same credibility as poll numbers during an election year.

Figures don't lie, but liars can figure...

They all say what they want them to say.

Quote: Alicewonders wrote in post #14

---

To me, any Covid numbers are to be taken with the same credibility as poll numbers during an election year.

Figures don't lie, but liars can figure...

They all say what they want them to say.

---