Murkowski question: Why should this body not call Amb Bolton?

Philibin: The House chose not to subpoena Bolton. Whatever impeachment proceeding is accepted by this House, becomes the precedent for the future. This chamber will become the investigatory body rather than the House.

The new normal w/b there doesn't have to be a complete investigation in the House and the new normal would be impeachment itself.

He then stressed that the Bolton quote is "alleged" it's not even confirmed.

The questions are devolving into idiocy.

Quote: Right_in_Virginia wrote in post #122

---

Murkowski question: Why should this body not call Amb Bolton?

Philibin: The House chose not to subpoena Bolton. Whatever impeachment proceeding is accepted by this House, becomes the precedent for the future. This chamber will become the investigatory body rather than the House.

The new normal w/b there doesn't have to be a complete investigation in the House and the new normal would be impeachment itself.

He then stressed that the Bolton quote is "alleged" it's not even confirmed.

---

Quote

---

Mark R. Levin

1. If the president had complied with every demand and subpoena for witnesses, classified information, and grand jury information, as the Democrat managers have insisted for days he was required to do,

2. the president would’ve destroyed the office of the presidency, crippled the executive branch, effectively eviscerated separation of powers, and helped establish an extraordinarily powerful and tyrannical House.

3. It’s the president who’s defending and protecting the Constitution, for which the radical and rogue House Democrats have impeached him and demand his removal.

---

Quote: EdJames wrote in post #121

---

Quote: disndat wrote in post #119

---

Quote: EdJames wrote in post #118

---

Quote: disndat wrote in post #117

---

Quote: EdJames wrote in post #116

---

Top Ironic Moment Contender: schift complaining of “repetitive monotony!”

---

Endless loop or endlessly loopy?

---

Both!

---

Unfortunately, we can all bear witness to that kind of unbearable repetitive monotony.

---

I hope to never do that here to you good folks!

---

Sen Kennedy question: Has the House of Representatives investigate the veracity of the WAPO article Jul 22, 2019 that the prosecutor (Shokin) was fired because he was investigating Burisma and would interview Hunter Biden?

Philbin: No. No one has inquired into this.

I'll post a clip of this reply ... good stuff.

Quote: Sanguine wrote in post #125

---

Quote: Right_in_Virginia wrote in post #123

---

The questions are devolving into idiocy.

---

That's all they've got.

---

Q: How would an acquittal affect the balance of power in the future?

Cip's answering for the president's counsel.

Oh, here's another clip to watch for.

Quote: Right_in_Virginia wrote in post #123

---

The questions are devolving into idiocy.

---

Quote: disndat wrote in post #129

---

Quote: Sanguine wrote in post #125

---

Quote: Right_in_Virginia wrote in post #123

---

The questions are devolving into idiocy.

---

That's all they've got.

---

It is all they ever had.

---

Pierre Delecto is still a yes vote on Bolton ....