Quote: EdJames wrote in post #90

---

Quote: Right_in_Virginia wrote in post #89

---

Q from Cruz and Graham: If Obama had evidence that Romney's son (had done what Hunter did) would Obama have the right to investigate this?

A from Schitt ... who's not answering the question.

---

Automatically Muted here....

---

Quote: Right_in_Virginia wrote in post #89

---

Q from Cruz and Graham: If Obama had evidence that Romney's son (had done what Hunter did) would Obama have the right to investigate this?

A from Schitt ... who's not answering the question.

---

Quote

---

Q: Does high crimes and misdemeanor include "breach of trust"

---

What the hell is breach of trust?? And how the hell does it apply here?

Let's just include jaywalking as a high crime and be done with it!

Quote

---

Mark Meadows
@RepMarkMeadows
·
1m
It would be nice if Adam Schiff and Democrats would apply their “Presidents shouldn’t investigate political rivals” standard to President Obama’s FBI and DOJ... who secretly investigated the 2016 Trump campaign

---

Quote

---

Demanding witnesses in the Senate “because it is a trial” is #Loserthink. You don’t win an argument by defining the terms your way.— Scott Adams (@ScottAdamsSays) January 29, 2020

---

Mute button invoked here! Can't handle the "lady" with the microwave hair!

Good! Counsel asked to explain (again) why the Schitt show's subpoena's had no authority.

Philbin's answering.

A house committee gets its authority solely from the full house. It a committee cannot trace its authority to a resolution from the House, then the subpoenas are null and void.

Quote

---

[b]Charlie Kirk
@charliekirk11
·
2m
Elizabeth Warren just announced a plan to criminally prosecute people for spreading "disinformation" online

I wonder if that would cover disinformation about:

Her "heritage"

Where she sent her kids to school

Her father's occupation

Getting fired for being pregnant[/b]

---

Philbin went on to say that when the House (finally) did pass a resolution authorizing an impeachment inquiry, the resolution did not even include giving retroactive power to Schitt's committee and subpoenas (although that would have been challenged.)

The WH rejected Schitt's subpoenas lawfully.

Quote

---

Will Chamberlain
🇺🇸
@willchamberlain
·
1h
The contrast between Adam Schiff and Patrick Philbin is dramatic

Philbin is calm, measured, and focused on the facts

Schiff is pompous, arrogant, and accusatory, and his style is going to lead to Dems losing the vote on witnesses and an early acquittal

---

Just for you @Right_in_Virginia

Fat boy is being disingenuous here .... the President refused to answer Schitt's subpoenas for all the reasons Philbin laid out. They were null and void!

We're going to break with a clean up question to the president's council.

Sekulow up.

Just got caught up on the thread. Thanks everyone for the informative posts. Listened to the questions while reviewing the thread. Had to mute Nadless and Schitt. They are so clownish compared to the defense team.