Quote: EdJames wrote in post #16

---

Quote: Tinker wrote in post #15

---

Whatever their reasoning was for getting rid of Tucker it is still their Bud Lite moment IMHO. Patently stupid!

BTW: I'll bet you don't know that Blackrock owns 59 million shares of Dominion stock as well as 47.5 million shares of Fox. So why did they sue themselves? Anyone have any ideas?

---

I have an idea... not sure if it is the case... but it would be a 'nifty' way to transfer nearly $800 million to Dominion....

---

Flash! I just heard that Mark Levin's Sunday show on Fox has been canceled as well. Can't confirm yet.

The Fox express keeps chugging right along!

Quote: EdJames wrote in post #16

---

Quote: Tinker wrote in post #15

---

Whatever their reasoning was for getting rid of Tucker it is still their Bud Lite moment IMHO. Patently stupid!

BTW: I'll bet you don't know that Blackrock owns 59 million shares of Dominion stock as well as 47.5 million shares of Fox. So why did they sue themselves? Anyone have any ideas?

---

I have an idea... not sure if it is the case... but it would be a 'nifty' way to transfer nearly $800 million to Dominion....

---

Pentagon officials say 'we're a better country' now that Tucker Carlson is off the air

Why in the world does an official with the DOD comment on this? Their attention should be the defense of our country, and not a reporter.

Energy Secretary Granholm Supports Making The Military All-Electric By 2030
By Ben Zeisloft
Apr 26, 2023 DailyWire.com

Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm voiced support on Wednesday for transitioning the military to exclusively rely upon electric vehicles before 2030.

Granholm affirmed her faith in the Biden administration proposal in a hearing for the Senate Armed Services Committee in which Sen. Joni Ernst (R-IA) pressed her on whether the policy would hinder the lethality of the military. She insisted that electrification would decrease vulnerability to worldwide turbulence in the fossil fuel sector.

I do think that reducing our reliance on the volatility of globally traded fossil fuels, where we know that global events such as the war in Ukraine can jack up prices for people back home does not contribute to energy security,” she commented. “I think energy security is achieved when we have home-grown, clean energy that is abundant.”

White House officials have indeed suggested an increase in electric vehicle reliance over the past two years as part of a broader renewable energy adoption in the federal government. President Joe Biden vowed in a speech last year that his administration would “start the process where every vehicle in the United States military” would become “climate friendly.”

“You know, in my view, this crisis, as I said, is a genuine opportunity,” he added. “An opportunity to do things we wanted to do, and only now it’s become so apparent.”

Deputy Defense Secretary Kathleen Hicks likewise asserted two years ago that creating a “zero emissions non-tactical vehicle fleet” and optimizing “energy use in our tactical vehicles” is a necessary part of the military’s climate mission. “Tactical vehicle electrification, initially through hybrid electric technology, has the potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, but it should also provide significant operational capability,” she claimed. “Electric vehicles are quiet. They have a low heat signature, and incredible torque, and because they tend to be low maintenance with fewer moving parts. They have the potential to reduce logistics requirements, all with these attributes can help give our troops an edge on the battlefield.”

Electric vehicles nevertheless require charging infrastructure and are currently seen by some as less reliable than internal combustion vehicles. Sen. Angus King (I-ME) introduced a bill last year to require at least 75% of the 174,000 non-tactical vehicles used by the Defense Department to be electric or zero emission since most of the government’s annual emissions come from the agency. The bill, however, did not suggest electrifying tactical vehicles.

Senior officials in the Biden administration have pursued similar objectives in other federal agencies such as the Postal Service, which will acquire 66,000 electric vehicles by 2028. The administration has established the overall goal of procuring only zero emission light-duty vehicles for the federal fleet by 2027 and will extend the standard to all federal vehicles by 2035.

The Biden administration, which has established a “whole-of-government effort” to reduce carbon emissions and incentivize renewables, has also introduced new emissions rules for gas stoves, air conditioners, and mobile homes.

The EPA most recently proposed vehicle emissions standards that would aim to increase adoption of electric cars, effectively inducing a 56% decrease in greenhouse gas emissions for light-duty vehicles, as well as a 44% decrease for medium-duty vehicles. The regulations would attempt to change market conditions such that electric vehicles constitute the majority of new sales for light-duty vehicles and nearly half of new sales for medium-duty vehicles by 2032.
https://www.dailywire.com/news/energy-se...lectric-by-2030

God help us. Lunatics running the country, interested in climate change over military preparedness.

And this idiot must not know what an EMT is either, which would immediately cripple 100% of her fantasy vehicles.

Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm voiced support on Wednesday for transitioning the military to exclusively rely upon electric vehicles before 2030.

Burning gunpowder releases all kinds of gas nobody wants to breathe. Should we have emissions controls for battlefield weapons? And should they shoot bullets, which carry a risk to adversaries of copper jacketed lead poisoning? I think essential oils strategically directed to enemy chakras would be a great holistic tactic.

'Course, when the lamb lies down with the lion, the lamb is usually reposing in the lion's casserole dish. It's a lion-eat-lamb world out there.