GOP 'Spartacus' Needed to Out Whistleblower
American Thinker, Nov 23, 2019, Daniel John Sobieski

It’s time for the charade to end and for a GOP congressman to end it. We all know who he is and we all know House Impeachment -- er -- Intelligence Committee Adam “Shifty” Schiff knows who he is. He and or his staff met with him long before the ICIG received any complaint, likely colluding with him and coaching him as they tinkered together his error-filled complaint. Yet, despite courageous and ferocious cross-examination by GOP representatives of Schiff’s parade of hearsay witnesses, one name goes unspoken, with Schiff successfully intimidating the GOP based on another Schiff lie – that his individual is a true whistleblower whose identity is protected by law.

His name, as I and others have written on these pages, is Eric Ciaramella. He is the accuser that President Trump has been denied his due process right to confront. He is intimately connected with another deep state agent, DNC operative Alexandra Chalupa, a key fact witness deeply involved in the coup being hidden by Schiff. He is the CIA operative or mole detailed to the White House as a John Brennan plant who is not a genuine whistleblower and, despite what Schiff says, is not entitled to anonymity under the whistleblower law or by the Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG) statutes. Yet the likes of ranking member Devin Nunes, R- Calif., were intimidated by Schiff into frustrated submission: [...]

Vindman essentially acknowledged he was one of the sources for the whistleblower’s hearsay. The exchange continued with Nunes pressing Vindman to be more specific and asking why he could not name the specific intelligence agency the alleged whistleblower was at before the Intelligence Committee, whereupon Schiff laid down his version of the law:

Quote

---

Are you aware that this is the Intelligence Committee that's conducting this impeachment hearing?" Nunes asked. "Wouldn't the appropriate place for you to come to testify would be the Intelligence Committee about someone within the intelligence community?"

Eventually, Vindman's lawyer jumped in to make clear that Vindman was not invoking his Fifth Amendment rights, as Nunes implied, but simply following Schiff's ruling. This prompted Schiff to jump in again, citing a whistleblower's legal protections.

"The whistleblower has right, the statutory right to anonymity, these proceedings will not be used to out the whistleblower," he said.

---

That is another bald-faced Adam Schiff lie. The whistleblower has no statutory right to anonymity. And it is at this time Nunes should have pulled the curtain away from Schiff’s comical cover-up and tell the world we know that the whistleblower is Eric Ciaramella. There is nothing Schiff could have done to Nunes.

More: https://www.americanthinker.com/articles...stleblower.html

Outing and putting Ciaramella under oath exposes the true collusion and blows impeachment out of the water.

This really needs to be done .... and BEFORE the impeachment vote is taken in the House!

Nunes...Jordan...Paul.....will anyone step up??

I too wish someone would step up and just say the name. Why are they intimidated by Adam Schitt? Wha t would happen to someone who spoke the forbidden name? Schiff said he wouldn't allow the shampeachment hearings to be used to "unmask" the complainant (not a whistleblower). Well, the hearings are over.